Overview
Shift from Server-Trust to Client-Proof.
STAT_01
ADOPTION RATE
18%
Client-Side Encryption Usage
STAT_02
CRITICAL RISK
42%
Sites Vulnerable to XSS
STAT_03
CRACK TIME
∞
With Proper AES-256-GCM
Architecture Breakdown
Data Source: 2024 Industry Survey of 50 Top Secure Note Services
Cipher Lab
Real-time Crypto Playground.
Level: Weak. A basic letter shifter. Good for learning, bad for secrets.
Shift Amount (1-25)
Entropy Estimate: WEAK
INPUT (Plain Text)
⬇
OUTPUT (Cipher Text)
Secret Lifecycle
Visualizing "Zero-Knowledge"
CURRENT STEP: IDLE
CLIENT (You)
💻
BROWSER
(Empty)
PROCESS
⚙️
ENCRYPTION
KEY GENERATED
SERVER (Cloud)
☁️
DATABASE
(Waiting)
FINAL URL CONSTRUCTION
https://secure-note.io/v1/...#8f9a2b...
Threat Map
Trust No One.
ATTACK VECTORS
1. MALICIOUS ADMIN
CVSS 9.8Server owner modifies JS code to log keys.
MITIGATION: Subresource Integrity (SRI) or Browser Extensions.
2. MITM INJECTION
CVSS 7.5ISP or WiFi interception.
MITIGATION: HSTS Preload & TLS 1.3.
3. HISTORY LEAK
CVSS 4.3Full URL stored in browser history/proxy logs.
MITIGATION: Burn-After-Reading (Delete on view).
Market Data
SECURITY vs CONVENIENCE
ALGO DOMINANCE
RECOMMENDED STACK
-
✓AES-256-GCMAuthenticated Encryption.
-
✓Argon2idMemory-hard Key Derivation.
-
XNo PolyfillsUse window.crypto.subtle only.
Simulator
Architecture Scoring System
CONFIGURATION
Encrypt data before sending.
Delete from DB after 1 view.
Store key in URL hash only.
Verify JS files haven't changed.
Security Score
0
CRITICAL
Awaiting Configuration...